Arizona's fake electors score a win with laughable free speech claim
- An Arizona judge ruled that the fake electors can argue their case under Arizona's anti-SLAPP law, which protects free speech, according to Judge Sam Myers.
- The judge's decision allows the defendants to claim they are being persecuted for exercising their constitutional rights, as stated in the ruling.
- Attorney General Kris Mayes disagrees with the ruling and plans to appeal, arguing that filing forged slates of electors is not lawful free speech.
- The ruling is seen as a setback for those opposing the First Amendment right to contest election results, as noted in the opinion piece.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
5 Articles
5 Articles
All
Left
4
Center
Right
1
Coverage Details
Total News Sources5
Leaning Left4Leaning Right1Center0Last UpdatedBias Distribution80% Left
Bias Distribution
- 80% of the sources lean Left
80% Left
L 80%
R 20%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage