Asylum seekers lose High Court bid for damages
- The High Court ruled against two asylum seekers, finding their detention lawful while their visa applications were processed, including protection applications.
- The asylum seekers argued their detention was unlawful, stating there were risks of cruel treatment for the Polish man and the death penalty for the Vietnamese man if they were returned home.
- The court found that the detention was constitutionally valid and necessary for processing their visa applications, dismissing claims about a lack of removal prospects as irrelevant.
- The case clarified that detention for visa processing remains valid under the constitution, countering claims that it was punitive.
7 Articles
7 Articles
Asylum seekers lose illegal detention bid in same court as controversial 2023 ruling
An attempt to extend the scope of a controversial High Court ruling on immigration detention has failed in the same court, drawing ire from refugee advocates.Two asylum seekers — from Poland and Vietnam — sought damages after claiming it was illegal for immigration authorities to detain them while their applications for protection visas were being processed.Both men were taken into detention after they served prison sentences for drug offences c…


Misinformation being ‘whipped up’ over immigration cases – Attorney General
Misinformation is being “whipped up” over asylum and immigration cases in relation to international human rights law, the Government’s top legal adviser has said. Lord Richard Hermer KC (pictured) warned
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 67% of the sources lean Left
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage