Isaacman calls potential NASA science cuts not “optimal”

Isaacman calls potential NASA science cuts not “optimal”

NASA administrator nominee Jared Isaacman says he would, if necessary, prioritize Artemis over human missions to Mars and calls a potential halving of NASA science funding not “optimal.” The post Isaacman calls potential NASA science cuts not “optimal” appeared first on SpaceNews.

NASA’s $10 billion giant space telescope, James Webb, could come to a halt due to major cuts in the science budget in the U.S. The Trump administration’s policies toward NASA threaten many scientific projects, not just James Webb.

BBC Inside Science - What would cuts to Nasa mean for space science? - BBC Sounds - Daily news Update

Reaction to White House proposals to cut funding for Nasa and a future asteroid fly past Source link The post BBC Inside Science – What would cuts to Nasa mean for space science? – BBC Sounds appeared first on Daily news Update.

U.S. President Donald Trump submitted to Congress a first plan to reduce the resources allocated to NASA. The space agency could find itself amputated by a large part of its scientific activity "We don't have to make a binary decision between the Moon or Mars. We can do both in parallel." Jared Isaacman's statement, the billionaire interviewed on April 9 to take the lead of NASA, raised some eyebrows. How to ensure ambitious Artemis lunar missio…