Judge denies injunction for four players suing NCAA
- A judge in North Carolina denied a preliminary injunction sought by four players Tuesday.
- These players challenged NCAA rules to secure another year of eligibility.
- The three-hour hearing took place in North Carolina Business Court.
- Judge Matthew Houston found the evidence 'not sufficient' and plaintiffs cited $100,000 to $500,000 in claimed earnings loss.
- The denial means players do not gain eligibility for the upcoming NFL draft.
45 Articles
45 Articles

Judge delays $2.8 billion NCAA settlement to address roster limit concerns, backs rest of plan
The judge overseeing the sprawling $2.8 billion antitrust lawsuit settlement involving the NCAA and the nation’s five largest conferences delayed final approval of the plan until it is modified to address concerns about roster limits.

Judge denies injunction for four players suing NCAA
RALEIGH, N.C. — A judge denied a preliminary injunction Tuesday sought by four college football players who had sued to gain an additional season of eligibility.
Former Duke, UNC players sue NCAA for additional eligibility
DURHAM, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS)—A North Carolina judge is set to hear a case Tuesday from former Duke and UNC athletes seeking another year of eligibility from the NCAA. Two similar suits, filed in early April in Durham County Superior Court, are challenging the association’s longstanding eligibility rules, declaring student-athletes must complete their four years of play within five calendar years. One suit involves former Duke players Ryan Smit…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 64% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage