Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man's lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis
- On April 24, 2025, Louisiana District Court Judge Alvin Sharp vacated Jimmie Duncan's first-degree murder conviction and death sentence due to unreliable bite mark evidence used against him.
- Experts testified that bite mark analysis is scientifically invalid and supported Duncan's claim of innocence, stating his girlfriend's daughter likely died from accidental drowning.
- The district attorney may appeal Judge Sharp's decision, while Louisiana's recent legal changes could complicate the process for future innocence claims like Duncan's.
14 Articles
14 Articles
Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man's lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Louisiana man who has spent nearly three decades on death row has had his conviction overturned by a district judge following a review of forensic analysis that the inmate’s legal team argued was based on “junk science.” Jimmie Duncan was originally convicted of first-degree murder in 1998 after being accused by prosecutors of raping and drowning his girlfriend’s toddler in a bathtub. Prosecutors relied on bite mark analysis…
Louisiana Judge Sets Aside Jimmie Duncan’s Conviction and Death Sentence Based on “No Longer Valid” Bite Mark Evidence | Death Penalty Information Center
On April 24, 2025, Louisiana District Court Judge Alvin Sharp set aside Jimmie Duncan’s first-degree murder conviction and death sentence. Mr. Duncan was sentenced to death for the 1993 death of his girlfriend’s toddler largely based on faulty bite mark evidence. Judge Sharp, in a decision that came after a September 2024 evidentiary hearing, held that expert testimony presented during this hearing demonstrated the bite mark…
Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man's lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis - The Morning Sun
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Louisiana man who has spent nearly three decades on death row has had his conviction overturned by a district judge following a review of forensic analysis that the inmate's legal team argued was based on “junk science.” Jimmie Duncan was originally convicted of first-degree murder in 1998 after being accused by prosecutors of raping and drowning his girlfriend's toddler in a bathtub. Prosecutors relied on bite mark analysis…
Louisiana death row conviction overturned as man’s lawyers cite faulty forensic analysis - Regional Media News
NEW ORLEANS (AP) — A Louisiana man who has spent nearly three decades on death row has had his conviction overturned by a district judge following a review of forensic analysis that the inmate’s legal team argued was based on “junk science.” Jimmie Duncan was originally convicted of first-degree murder in 1998 after being accused by prosecutors of raping and drowning his girlfriend’s toddler in a bathtub. Prosecutors relied on bite mark analysis…
Coverage Details
Bias Distribution
- 55% of the sources are Center
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage