North Carolina justices decide family can sue over unwanted COVID-19 shot
- The North Carolina Supreme Court ruled 5-2 that a family can sue for a COVID-19 vaccine administered to a minor without parental consent, overturning previous legal protections related to the federal Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act .
- Chief Justice Paul Newby stated that the vaccine administration violated constitutional rights, allowing for legal action against the school and medical clinic involved.
- Justice Allison Riggs dissented, arguing the majority's ruling misinterpreted federal law and criticized their constitutional analysis.
- Tanner Smith's family claims he received the vaccine despite his protests and lack of consent, leading to the lawsuit against health officials.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
53 Articles
53 Articles
All
Left
10
Center
4
Right
25
Coverage Details
Total News Sources53
Leaning Left10Leaning Right25Center4Last UpdatedBias Distribution64% Right
Bias Distribution
- 64% of the sources lean Right
64% Right
L 26%
R 64%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage