US EditionRoster limit changes not offered in latest filing on $2.8 billion NCAA lawsuit settlement
- Attorneys filed a brief on a $2.8 billion settlement that did not include roster limit changes suggested by a judge, saying it would cause havoc.
- The settlement allows schools to pay athletes for their name, image and likeness, and provides $2.78 billion in back pay to athletes who played before NIL rules.
- While the settlement may cost some athletes roster spots, attorneys argued it offers new opportunities for compensation and benefits.
Insights by Ground AI
Does this summary seem wrong?
89 Articles
89 Articles
All
Left
23
Center
49
Right
3
The Logan Banner+2 Reposted by 2 other sources
Paul Saluja: WV must allow NIL deals for high school athletes
The recent $2.8 billion settlement in House v. NCAA is more than a headline—it’s a seismic shift in the landscape of college athletics. This case, which directly confronts decades of inequity in athlete compensation, is the latest in a series…
Daily Journal+13 Reposted by 13 other sources
Objectors have final say and $2.8 billion NCAA lawsuit settlement goes to judge for a decision
The $2.8 billion legal settlement designed to reshape college sports is now before a federal judge for a final decision.
·Cherokee County, United States
Read Full Article
Roster limit changes not offered in latest filing on NCAA settlement
Attorneys working on the $2.8 billion legal settlement designed to reshape college sports filed a brief Monday night that did not include changes a judge suggested regarding team roster limits, saying such a late change to that rule would create…
Coverage Details
Total News Sources89
Leaning Left23Leaning Right3Center49Last UpdatedBias Distribution65% Center
Bias Distribution
- 65% of the sources are Center
65% Center
L 31%
C 65%
Factuality
To view factuality data please Upgrade to Premium
Ownership
To view ownership data please Upgrade to Vantage
