Supreme Court Lined Up to Consider Case That Could Kill ‘One of the Most Reviled Decisions in Recent Decades’

Supreme Court Lined Up to Consider Case That Could Kill 'One of the Most Reviled Decisions in Recent Decades'

The Supreme Court may soon confront a pivotal case that challenges the controversial Kelo decision, potentially reshaping the future of property rights and government overreach. Insights await in this critical legal analysis.

Supreme Court lined up to consider case that could kill 'one of the most reviled decisions in recent decades' * WorldNetDaily * by Bob Unruh

'It is simply wrong to let the government take one person's property away in order to hand it to another private owner with more political power'

There is not only the Charter of the French Language that protects the linguistic rights of Francophones and Anglophones in Canada, there is also the Official Languages Act. Adopted in 1969, but modernized in 2023, this federal law requires that all Canadian courts translate their decisions into both official languages. Although the Supreme Court of Canada has translated all its decisions into English and French since 1969, this is not the case …

Supreme Court Lined Up to Consider Case That Could Kill ‘One of the Most Reviled Decisions in Recent Decades’

US Supreme Court Credit: The Gateway Pundit Photo It is simply wrong to let the government take one person’s property away in order to hand it to another private owner with more political power.’An often-criticized precedent from the Supreme Court 20 years ago that gives local governments permission to literally confiscate a landowner’s property and give it to someone else who may have more political influence could be overturned through a new c…

Australian National Review - Supreme Court Lined Up to Consider Case That Could Kill 'One of the Most Reviled Decisions in Recent Decades'

US Supreme Court Credit: The Gateway Pundit Photo This article originally appeared on WND.com Guest by post by Bob Unruh It is simply wrong to let the government take one person’s property away in order to hand it to another private owner with more political power.’ An often-criticized precedent from the Supreme Court 20 years ago that gives local governments permission to literally confiscate a landowner’s property and give it to someone else w…