Wrong, New York Times, Climate Change Isn’t Disrupting Blood Supplies

Wrong, New York Times, Climate Change Isn’t Disrupting Blood Supplies

This article shows that the NYT continues to be wedded to promoting pseudoscientific climate alarmism. Rather than investigating the real causes complicating and limiting blood donation and delivery, ranging from donor apathy to poor planning, NYT chose to blame climate change: the convenient boogeyman for everything from crime, to immigration, to acne—now apparently, it’s coming for your blood.

Wrong, New York Times, Climate Change Isn’t Disrupting Blood Supplies - ClimateRealism

In “Climate Change Is Stressing the World’s Blood Supplies,” the New York Times (NYT) claims that global warming is now threatening the blood supply by causing extreme weather events that disrupt donations, transport, and safety. This is misleading at best. Since extreme weather events aren’t increasing or becoming more severe, it is unclear how climate change could be causing unusual disruptions in the blood supply. The NYT article’s central th…